Study assesses machine translation for marketing purposes

Episode 180 August 03, 2022 00:03:19
Study assesses machine translation for marketing purposes
Localization Today
Study assesses machine translation for marketing purposes

Aug 03 2022 | 00:03:19


Hosted By

Marjolein Groot Nibbelink Nico Palomo Eddie Arrieta

Show Notes

A new study from Weglot and Nimdzi Insights suggests that machine translation (MT) is more accurate than some people might expect.

View Full Transcript

Episode Transcript

A new study from Weglot and Nimdzi Insights suggests that machine translation (MT) is more accurate than some people might expect. The study, “The State of Machine Translation for Websites,” focuses on assessing the accuracy of popular MT engines like Google Translate, specifically within the domain of the marketing content found on a given company’s website. After a group of linguists determined the usability of a given MT engine’s output, the study concluded that 85% of translations were rated as “very good” or “acceptable.” “The data presented in this study debunks some of the persisting myths and confirms that machine translation can be deployed as an accelerator in the translation process for marketing content,” said Weglot CEO Augustin Prot. “Machine translation has reached a level of maturity where it now complements, rather than replaces, human linguists.” With recent advances in MT, the general public’s opinion of the technology has also grown — for example, a recent study conducted in the United Kingdom found that only a small minority of nontechnical MT users were dissatisfied with their experiences using MT engines. However, the report notes that many companies remain skeptical of MT “due to the prejudices that have arisen over the years in the localization industry.” In the study, the researchers looked at translations from English into six languages: French, German, Spanish, European Portuguese, Mandarin Chinese, and Arabic. The researchers behind the study claim that their findings should debunk some of this prejudice and show that MT is an adequate supplementary tool for localizing certain marketing content. As noted earlier, 85% of the translations were determined to be “very good” or “acceptable” — none of the translations received a “very bad” rating. The researchers did find that some languages had better output than others, with German translations receiving the highest average acceptability and Italian translations receiving the lowest. The researchers also found a handful of common errors the MT engines made. Specifically, they pointed out three common ones: the MT engines struggled to translate context-dependent phrases or terminology, struggled with the ampersand, and occasionally infused the European Portuguese translations with a Brazilian twist. “An estimated 99% of translations globally are not done by professional human translators — simply because there’s not enough time in the world,” Prot said. “As such, the volume of machine-translated content has skyrocketed over the past couple of years, and we only expect to see this further as the technology develops and matures.”

Other Episodes

Episode 287

December 15, 2022 00:02:37
Episode Cover

Linguistic diversity is increasing in the US. What does that mean for language access?

In the United States, the number of people who speak a language other than English at home is rising faster than those who mainly...


Episode 71

April 18, 2022 00:03:17
Episode Cover

What AI could tell us about language evolution

If you’ve ever read the work of William Shakespeare, you should be fairly familiar with the phenomenon of language change. Now, a recent study...


Episode 301

December 22, 2022 00:03:39
Episode Cover

Keeping individuals with LEP up to date on environmental issues

Recently, advocates in the US state of New Jersey raised concerns about the state not providing adequate language access services at community meetings on...