Linguistic gender bias goes further than you may expect

Episode 64 April 07, 2022 00:04:07
Linguistic gender bias goes further than you may expect
Localization Today
Linguistic gender bias goes further than you may expect

Apr 07 2022 | 00:04:07

/

Hosted By

Eddie Arrieta

Show Notes

Researchers at New York University have found that the English word “people” may not be as gender-neutral as you might think.

View Full Transcript

Episode Transcript

Researchers at New York University have found that the English word “people” may not be as gender-neutral as you might think. Of course, the word’s dictionary definition does not denote a specific gender identity — however, using artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze a corpus of 630 billion words paints a different picture of how the word is actually used by English speakers. In a paper published in Science Advances, the team of researchers found that speakers tend to use the word “people” in contexts more frequently associated with men than with women. The study could potentially shed further light on the gender bias in machine translation (MT) and the corpora used to develop MT models, which MultiLingual reported on last year. “Many forms of bias, such as the tendency to associate ‘science’ with men more than women, have been studied in the past, but there has been much less work on how we view a ‘person,’ ” said April Bailey, the lead author of the paper. In recent years, users of Google Translate and other MT systems have criticized MT for its gender bias in certain translations — in one example, a user noted that the gender-neutral third-person pronoun in Finnish was translated to “he” in the sentence “He takes care of things” but was translated to “she” in the sentence “She is taking care of the child.” This is essentially the result of the AI replicating gender biases that already exist in human language. Still, the recent study suggests that such gender bias in human language goes even deeper than this. “The ‘people = men’ bias in word embeddings likely spills over into the wide range of downstream artificial intelligence applications that use word embeddings, including machine translation,” the study reads. Example of Google Translate’s efforts to reduce gender bias in translation. In response to criticism, tech companies like Google have attempted to mitigate some of the issues associated with this gender bias. In the case of Google Translate, the system now outputs multiple translations for sentences and words that could have multiple different gendered interpretations (as in the case of the Finnish-to-English examples mentioned earlier). The researchers in the current study note that these efforts have only focused on explicitly gendered language, not taking into account the underlying gender bias of seemingly gender-neutral words like “people.” “Ongoing efforts to “debias” word embeddings to prevent them from replicating such biases have yielded mixed results and have yet to consider the fundamental ‘people = men’ bias we uncover here,” the researchers write. “We hope that the present work guides future efforts to debias natural language processing algorithms.”

Other Episodes

Episode 206

August 29, 2024 00:32:58
Episode Cover

Driving Growth in the Language Industry

A conversation with Alexandra Jarvis, Chief Strategy Officer of Toppan Digital Language, and Christophe Djaouani, President, about TDL's recent acquisition and its impact on...

Listen

Episode 182

August 05, 2022 00:04:33
Episode Cover

Where to take your games abroad: a practical guide

The gaming industry is forecasted to grow at an explosive rate of over 9% in the next three years. One of the fastest-growing industries...

Listen

Episode 143

June 16, 2022 00:04:01
Episode Cover

Mistranslated advertising hinders campaign for San Francisco’s Proposition A

A botched translation of promotional material could have cost the election for supporters of San Francisco’s Proposition A.

Listen